Can't we just solve this with more [X] ?
It is easy to conclude that with time, societies will equalize. That [X], any popular dominant design, will eventually reach everyone, societies will converge and all you need is more [X]. Not exactly. Confounders to wicked problems ensure heterogeneity in cultures and access. Environment, politics, history, economics. And is more efficient or even sustainable?
We end up with inefficient uses of [X]. Problems persist, people get left behind and we remain stuck in the present. There're always spaces where more of [X] does not solve problems. More messaging apps or more diagnostic platforms still have a hard time controlling STI infections in our communities. Or predicting emergence of disease.
The opposite of more then, is new.
We're solving for the current and future health of our communities and environments. We're building new resilient diagnostic tools not just for 0 to 1, but for emergent phenomenon. A different class of progress, for a world that is today, and the new world that will be in the next hundred years.
Drizzle is the great equalizer. So should be health.

The members of Drizzle

Munendra Singh
Munendra is a seasoned professional and is supporting all things manufacturing and compliance at Drizzle Health India.
Having an impact in bio/health is more possible than ever!
The question to ask, is if this is something that's extremely important to have in the future. In effect, if you help shape this, would you have helped change the future in a way that agrees with your greatest internal values, as compared to what you're doing now? If yes, shoot us an email!